Gilles Arnaud Bailly vs Svyatoslav Gulin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When evaluating second serve performance over the past six months, Gulin has a slight edge, having won 43.43% of points compared to Bailly's 38.68%. Could this be a decisive factor in the match?
• In return game stats, Bailly has narrowly outperformed Gulin on second serve returns, winning 44.59% of points versus Gulin's 44.1%. On first serve returns, however, Gulin leads with 29.32% compared to Bailly's 28.61%.
• Under pressure, both players have similar capabilities. Gulin has the upper hand by saving 49.33% of breakpoints, while Bailly has saved 48.42%.
• Over the past year, Gulin has shown a higher overall match win percentage of 73.42% as compared to Bailly's 63.93%, potentially indicating greater consistency.
• Looking at surface performance, Bailly excels on Hard courts with a 69% win rate, whereas Gulin is dominant on Clay with a 72% win rate. Could the match's surface give either player an advantage?
• Considering match level, Gulin has a stronger track record in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, with a win rate of 75%, overshadowing Bailly's 63.79%.
• Analyzing the quality of opponents, Bailly has faced slightly higher-ranked players, averaging a rank of 376.26 compared to Gulin's 394.03.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Gulin holds a stronger record, winning 59% of such sets versus Bailly's 46%.
• Current event performance and familiarity with the event can alter predictions, so it's crucial to consider how both players have fared in the current tournament context.
• Finally, in breakpoint conversion, Bailly has been slightly more effective recently, converting 37.93% of opportunities compared to Gulin's 37.31%.

Editorial Prediction (May 12, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the upcoming tennis match between Bailly and Gulin, various performance metrics provide insights into their prospects. Although Gulin has shown a notable advantage in overall match winning percentage and deciding set performance, Bailly has demonstrated more proficiency in converting breakpoint opportunities.

Surface proficiency plays a significant role, with Bailly performing well on Hard courts and Gulin excelling on Clay. The match surface could thus be a pivotal element in determining the victor.

Ultimately, Gulin's higher recent form in consistent performance, particularly in pressure scenarios and match-level win rate, suggests that Gulin is the more likely candidate to emerge victorious in their upcoming encounter. However, Bailly's strengths in return games and breakpoint conversions should not be overlooked.